The Reduction Of The U.S. Military Budget

"The Pentagon, headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, taken from an airplane in January 2008." Picture by David B. Gleason, Wikimedia Commons (CC_BY-SA_2.0)
“The Pentagon, headquarters of the United States Department of Defense, taken from an airplane in January 2008.” Picture by David B. Gleason, Wikimedia Commons (CC_BY-SA_2.0)

In late February 2014, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel announced that the Pentagon would reduce the size of the United States Army “to its smallest force since before the World War II buildup and eliminate an entire class of Air Force attack jets,” according to the New York Times. The current spending proposal, Pentagon officials say, seeks to “aggressively push the military off the war footing adopted after the terror attacks of 2001.” In other words, there will be a reduction of the military budget.

However, there are two areas given special attention: Special Operations forces and cyberwarfare. The latter point has been unmistakably underscored through the Snowden leaks since last summer. U.S. aircraft carriers will remain at 11.

As it seems, the future of war will continue to involve special forces, drones, and hacking, not the mass armies of World War Two.

But any reduction of the military budget will prompt those working in the interest of the military-industrial complex to cry wolf.

For instance, war criminal former Vice President Dick Cheney. In an interview with Fox News, Cheney claimed that the real reason President Barack Obama wanted to cut the defense budget was because “he would rather spend money on food stamps.”

Do you remember the phrase “food stamp president”? It was used by Newt Gingrich in 2012. Some explanations from the Christian Science Monitor, NPR, CNNMoney, and the Economist.

Here is a quick reminder about the U.S. military budget:

According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS),

[t]he United States remained by far the world’s biggest defence spender in 2013, with a budget of $600.4 billion, [. . .] followed by China ($112.2 billion), Russia ($68.2 billion) and Saudi Arabia ($59.6 billion).

Infographic from the AFP (2014) (via Digital Journal)

Here is an older infographic from 2010 (via the Guardian)

If you look at the data, you cannot help but think that the notion that cutting back on the military budget to some extent would render the U.S. militarily incapable is pure propaganda. The magnitude by which U.S. military spending currently trumps all other states in the world is just so vast.

Finally, another point why it might be worth considering to reduce some military spending is that there is some serious waste going on in the Pentagon.

Read more:

President Obama and the defense budget: a factoid that falls short.” (, Washington Post, 2012/01/12)  – Comparing military spending is fuzzy, but nevertheless the U.S. leads, Glenn Kessler shows.

Does America Spend More Than Next 10 Nations Combined on Defense?” (James Joyner, Outside the Beltway, 2012/01/12) – Joyner comments on Kessler’s criticism and concludes that “[the U.S.] and our allies absolutely dwarf and potential foe in military power.”




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *