Democracy? National Security? No, You Fools, for Hillary, the Iraq War Was All About the Money

“It’s time for the United States to start thinking of Iraq as a business opportunity.” – Hillary Clinton, 2011

There are apparently some interesting items coming out of Hillary Clinton’s released cache of e-mails.

And they seem to strengthen the notion that, after all, the Iraq War was not primarily fought for noble reasons such as ‘protecting national security’ or ‘promoting democracy.’ While boiling this down to the anti-war slogan ‘No Blood for Oil’ might simplify things a tad bid, this article by David Sirota points out in detail how Corporate America saw it as a way to get richer.

And guess who positioned  herself as a champion of those large corporations in Iraq, even a year before publicly declaring the Iraq War as “a mistake?” — Hillary Rodham Clinton.

American voters might want to take note in the upcoming election.

 

Quote: U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Russia, Ukraine

You just don’t in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text – U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Russia’s flexing of its military on Crimea

While I also find the events in Ukraine, particularly on Crimea, in the last days quite disturbing, there is nonetheless a certain hypocrisy in Kerry’s grandiose statement. The twenty-four hours news cycle may cater to short attention spans, but I still remember the fallacious rationale for the 2003 Invasion of Iraq: Saddam Hussein’s imaginary mobile laboratories for biological weapons. This arguably “completely trumped up pre-text” for war was based on faulty intelligence by Iraqi informant “Curveball”—interestingly passed on to the U.S. by the German BND—and propagated by then-Secretary of State Colin Powell in his infamous presentation before the UN Security Council on February 2, 2003.

You might say that I am not fond of any state’s war propaganda. The amoral nature of such deceptions lies in the fact that it is almost never the decision-makers who bear the consequences of their warmongering. Those who die in these wars die in vain, for lies, as pawns in geopolitical games, and for the profits of the military-industrial-complex. It is just horrible.